Independent comparison of Greenhouse and Workable for teams evaluating applicant tracking systems and recruiting software.
Disclosure: The HR Stack Guide is an independent comparison guide. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links at no extra cost to you. Read full disclosure.
Primary Terms & Pricing Audited Q3 2026 | Unbiased Data
⭐️ 4.4/5 (2,000+ reviews)
Based on G2 & Industry Benchmark user reviews
⭐️ 4.4/5 (800+ reviews)
Based on G2 & Industry Benchmark user reviews
The headline prices above rarely survive contact with a real quote. Here is what each vendor bills on top.
Pricing Nuance: Greenhouse: Greenhouse is quote-only on annual contracts, and the published tiers gate significant capability: advanced reporting, CRM, and parts of the compliance suite sit above the entry plan. Expect per-seat licensing plus an implementation fee, and confirm which of the 400+ integrations require a higher tier before you sign.
Pricing Nuance: Workable: Published pricing from $299/month is refreshingly transparent, but it is banded by headcount and the Standard plan caps active jobs. Video interviewing, candidate texting, and assessments are paid add-ons, so the AI sourcing database is the value driver at the base rate rather than the full toolkit.
The HR Stack Guide Take
If you need auditable, structured hiring backed by a deep integration ecosystem, Greenhouse is the stronger call for Scaleups: its scorecard methodology and DEI reporting are the category benchmark for defensible hiring decisions. If instead you want to post widely and source proactively without sitting through a sales call, Workable is the better shortlist candidate: one-click syndication to 200+ job boards plus a 400M-profile sourcing database ships in the base product.
This guide provides the baseline comparison for general technology buyers. If you are evaluating software for a specific team size or workflow, select your profile below:
| Feature | Best for Enterprise Structured Hiring Greenhouse | Best for Built-in AI Candidate Sourcing Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Scorecards | ||
| Candidate Sourcing CRM | ||
| AI Candidate Sourcing | ||
| Job Board Syndication | ||
| Multi-Language Support | ||
| Native HRIS Integration | ||
| Unlimited User Seats | ||
| GDPR Compliance Tools | ||
| Background Check Integrations | ||
| Free Trial Available | ||
| Ready to get started? |
Compliance standards, native integrations, support SLAs, deployment type, and ideal headcount for Greenhouse vs Workable.
| Capability | Greenhouse | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Standards | Compliance Standards:
| Compliance Standards:
|
| Native Integrations | Native Integrations:
| Native Integrations:
|
| Support & SLAs | Support & SLAs: 24/7 Enterprise Support, Dedicated CSM, Knowledge Base | Support & SLAs: Live Chat, Dedicated CSM (Premier+), Knowledge Base |
| Deployment Type | Deployment Type: Cloud / SaaS | Deployment Type: Cloud / SaaS / Mobile Native |
| Ideal Headcount | Ideal Headcount: 250–1000+ enterprise | Ideal Headcount: 1–50 seats |
4 dealbreaker questions to bring to your vendor sales calls before signing.
Ask both Greenhouse and Workable the same four questions so the answers are comparable before you commit.
Question 1
Ask Greenhouse and Workable: “What is the exact written notice window required to prevent auto-renewal, and what happens to historical payroll data upon contract exit?”
Question 2
Ask Greenhouse and Workable: “Are candidate CRM sourcing tools, automated nurture campaigns, and unlimited reviewer seats included in the base plan, or billed per recruiter license?”
Question 3
Ask Greenhouse and Workable: “Are pricing tiers locked to strict headcount thresholds, and does reducing seats mid-contract reduce our monthly bill?”
Question 4
Ask Greenhouse and Workable: “Is there a mandatory onboarding setup fee or dedicated account manager surcharge not listed on your public pricing page?”
Greenhouse is the better overall fit for technology buyers, startups, and scaleups. Based on The HR Stack Guide's 2026 evaluation, Greenhouse edges ahead for Scaleups despite matching 4.4/5 overall scores, because it covers more of the capabilities that matter here—interview scorecards, candidate pipeline stages, and sourcing CRM—and stronger support for structured scorecards, recruiting analytics, and predictable flat-tier pricing.
Greenhouse starts at Custom quote; Custom annual contract (quote-based). Workable starts at $299/mo; Standard plan from $299/mo (1–20 employees). Beyond the headline rates, here is the fine print. Greenhouse: Greenhouse is quote-only on annual contracts, and the published tiers gate significant capability: advanced reporting, CRM, and parts of the compliance suite sit above the entry plan. Expect per-seat licensing plus an implementation fee, and confirm which of the 400+ integrations require a higher tier before you sign. Workable: Published pricing from $299/month is refreshingly transparent, but it is banded by headcount and the Standard plan caps active jobs. Video interviewing, candidate texting, and assessments are paid add-ons, so the AI sourcing database is the value driver at the base rate rather than the full toolkit.
Yes, both platforms support multi-board job posting syndication and two-way worker record syncing with major HRIS platforms like BambooHR, Rippling, and Gusto.