Independent comparison of Ashby and Greenhouse for teams evaluating applicant tracking systems and recruiting software.
Disclosure: The HR Stack Guide is an independent comparison guide. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links at no extra cost to you. Read full disclosure.
Primary Terms & Pricing Audited Q3 2026 | Unbiased Data
⭐️ 4.7/5 (400+ reviews)
Based on G2 & Industry Benchmark user reviews
⭐️ 4.4/5 (2,000+ reviews)
Based on G2 & Industry Benchmark user reviews
The headline prices above rarely survive contact with a real quote. Here is what each vendor bills on top.
Pricing Nuance: Ashby: Flat-tier pricing from $400/month up to 100 employees means unlimited seats with no per-recruiter charge, which usually beats seat-based rivals once your interview panel grows. The catch is the step change: pricing rescales as headcount crosses tier boundaries, and there is no free trial, so budget for a paid pilot.
Pricing Nuance: Greenhouse: Greenhouse is quote-only on annual contracts, and the published tiers gate significant capability: advanced reporting, CRM, and parts of the compliance suite sit above the entry plan. Expect per-seat licensing plus an implementation fee, and confirm which of the 400+ integrations require a higher tier before you sign.
The HR Stack Guide Take
If you want funnel analytics and a sourcing CRM inside the ATS rather than bolted on afterwards, Ashby is the stronger call for Scaleups: its reporting depth and unlimited-seat flat tiers reward teams that actually instrument their hiring funnel. If instead you need auditable, structured hiring backed by a deep integration ecosystem, Greenhouse is the better shortlist candidate: its scorecard methodology and DEI reporting are the category benchmark for defensible hiring decisions.
This guide provides the baseline comparison for general technology buyers. If you are evaluating software for a specific team size or workflow, select your profile below:
| Feature | Best for All-in-One Recruiting Analytics Ashby | Best for Enterprise Structured Hiring Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Scorecards | ||
| Candidate Sourcing CRM | ||
| AI Candidate Sourcing | ||
| Job Board Syndication | ||
| Multi-Language Support | ||
| Native HRIS Integration | ||
| Unlimited User Seats | ||
| GDPR Compliance Tools | ||
| Background Check Integrations | ||
| Free Trial Available | ||
| Ready to get started? | Try Ashby ↗ |
Compliance standards, native integrations, support SLAs, deployment type, and ideal headcount for Ashby vs Greenhouse.
| Capability | Ashby | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Standards | Compliance Standards:
| Compliance Standards:
|
| Native Integrations | Native Integrations:
| Native Integrations:
|
| Support & SLAs | Support & SLAs: Dedicated CSM, Ticketed support, Knowledge Base | Support & SLAs: 24/7 Enterprise Support, Dedicated CSM, Knowledge Base |
| Deployment Type | Deployment Type: Cloud / SaaS | Deployment Type: Cloud / SaaS |
| Ideal Headcount | Ideal Headcount: 50–250 seats | Ideal Headcount: 250–1000+ enterprise |
4 dealbreaker questions to bring to your vendor sales calls before signing.
Ask both Ashby and Greenhouse the same four questions so the answers are comparable before you commit.
Question 1
Ask Ashby and Greenhouse: “What is the exact written notice window required to prevent auto-renewal, and what happens to historical payroll data upon contract exit?”
Question 2
Ask Ashby and Greenhouse: “Are candidate CRM sourcing tools, automated nurture campaigns, and unlimited reviewer seats included in the base plan, or billed per recruiter license?”
Question 3
Ask Ashby and Greenhouse: “Are pricing tiers locked to strict headcount thresholds, and does reducing seats mid-contract reduce our monthly bill?”
Question 4
Ask Ashby and Greenhouse: “Is there a mandatory onboarding setup fee or dedicated account manager surcharge not listed on your public pricing page?”
Ashby is the better overall fit for technology buyers, startups, and scaleups. Based on The HR Stack Guide's 2026 evaluation, Ashby edges out the competition for Scaleups due to its superior score (4.7/5), strength in interview scorecards, candidate pipeline stages, and sourcing CRM, and strong support for structured scorecards, recruiting analytics, and predictable flat-tier pricing.
Ashby starts at $400/mo; Flat monthly fee up to 100 employees (Foundations plan). Greenhouse starts at Custom quote; Custom annual contract (quote-based). Beyond the headline rates, here is the fine print. Ashby: Flat-tier pricing from $400/month up to 100 employees means unlimited seats with no per-recruiter charge, which usually beats seat-based rivals once your interview panel grows. The catch is the step change: pricing rescales as headcount crosses tier boundaries, and there is no free trial, so budget for a paid pilot. Greenhouse: Greenhouse is quote-only on annual contracts, and the published tiers gate significant capability: advanced reporting, CRM, and parts of the compliance suite sit above the entry plan. Expect per-seat licensing plus an implementation fee, and confirm which of the 400+ integrations require a higher tier before you sign.
Yes, both platforms support multi-board job posting syndication and two-way worker record syncing with major HRIS platforms like BambooHR, Rippling, and Gusto.