Independent comparison of Workable and JazzHR for teams evaluating applicant tracking systems and recruiting software.
Disclosure: The HR Stack Guide is an independent comparison guide. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links at no extra cost to you. Read full disclosure.
Primary Terms & Pricing Audited Q3 2026 | Unbiased Data
⭐️ 4.4/5 (800+ reviews)
Based on G2 & Industry Benchmark user reviews
⭐️ 4.4/5 (500+ reviews)
Based on G2 & Industry Benchmark user reviews
The headline prices above rarely survive contact with a real quote. Here is what each vendor bills on top.
Pricing Nuance: Workable: Published pricing from $299/month is refreshingly transparent, but it is banded by headcount and the Standard plan caps active jobs. Video interviewing, candidate texting, and assessments are paid add-ons, so the AI sourcing database is the value driver at the base rate rather than the full toolkit.
Pricing Nuance: JazzHR: From $75/month with unlimited user seats, JazzHR has the lowest true cost of entry in this comparison set, but plans are tiered by number of open jobs. Compliance reporting and several integrations require the higher tiers, and coverage is oriented to US and North American hiring.
The HR Stack Guide Take
If you want to post widely and source proactively without sitting through a sales call, Workable is the stronger call for Scaleups: one-click syndication to 200+ job boards plus a 400M-profile sourcing database ships in the base product. If instead you are cost-constrained and want every interviewer in the system without paying per seat, JazzHR is the better shortlist candidate: unlimited free seats at $75/month removes the usual trade-off between budget and panel participation.
This guide provides the baseline comparison for general technology buyers. If you are evaluating software for a specific team size or workflow, select your profile below:
| Feature | Best for Built-in AI Candidate Sourcing Workable | Best for Budget SMB Unlimited Posting JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Scorecards | ||
| Candidate Sourcing CRM | ||
| AI Candidate Sourcing | ||
| Job Board Syndication | ||
| Multi-Language Support | ||
| Native HRIS Integration | ||
| Unlimited User Seats | ||
| GDPR Compliance Tools | ||
| Background Check Integrations | ||
| Free Trial Available | ||
| Ready to get started? |
Compliance standards, native integrations, support SLAs, deployment type, and ideal headcount for Workable vs JazzHR.
| Capability | Workable | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Standards | Compliance Standards:
| Compliance Standards:
|
| Native Integrations | Native Integrations:
| Native Integrations:
|
| Support & SLAs | Support & SLAs: Live Chat, Dedicated CSM (Premier+), Knowledge Base | Support & SLAs: Email support, Ticketed SLA, Knowledge Base |
| Deployment Type | Deployment Type: Cloud / SaaS / Mobile Native | Deployment Type: Cloud / SaaS |
| Ideal Headcount | Ideal Headcount: 1–50 seats | Ideal Headcount: 1–50 seats |
4 dealbreaker questions to bring to your vendor sales calls before signing.
Ask both Workable and JazzHR the same four questions so the answers are comparable before you commit.
Question 1
Ask Workable and JazzHR: “What is the exact written notice window required to prevent auto-renewal, and what happens to historical payroll data upon contract exit?”
Question 2
Ask Workable and JazzHR: “Are candidate CRM sourcing tools, automated nurture campaigns, and unlimited reviewer seats included in the base plan, or billed per recruiter license?”
Question 3
Ask Workable and JazzHR: “Are pricing tiers locked to strict headcount thresholds, and does reducing seats mid-contract reduce our monthly bill?”
Question 4
Ask Workable and JazzHR: “Is there a mandatory onboarding setup fee or dedicated account manager surcharge not listed on your public pricing page?”
Workable is the better overall fit for technology buyers, startups, and scaleups. Based on The HR Stack Guide's 2026 evaluation, Workable edges ahead for Scaleups despite matching 4.4/5 overall scores, because it covers more of the capabilities that matter here—interview scorecards, candidate pipeline stages, and sourcing CRM—and stronger support for structured scorecards, recruiting analytics, and predictable flat-tier pricing.
Workable starts at $299/mo; Standard plan from $299/mo (1–20 employees). JazzHR starts at $75/mo; Tiered monthly plans from $75/mo. That's a difference of $224 at the entry tier. Beyond the headline rates, here is the fine print. Workable: Published pricing from $299/month is refreshingly transparent, but it is banded by headcount and the Standard plan caps active jobs. Video interviewing, candidate texting, and assessments are paid add-ons, so the AI sourcing database is the value driver at the base rate rather than the full toolkit. JazzHR: From $75/month with unlimited user seats, JazzHR has the lowest true cost of entry in this comparison set, but plans are tiered by number of open jobs. Compliance reporting and several integrations require the higher tiers, and coverage is oriented to US and North American hiring.
Yes, both platforms support multi-board job posting syndication and two-way worker record syncing with major HRIS platforms like BambooHR, Rippling, and Gusto.